READ THIS FIRST

THIS IS NOT AN OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE BAY COLONY CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. This blog was created to help Bay Colony Club Condominium (BCC) owners, resident non-owners, and employees know what’s happening in BCC. Any reader can comment on any of the articles by clicking on the “comments” below the article. The blog author is not responsible for any comments made by blog readers and may or may not agree with any or all comments. Please click on “Disclaimer” in the left-hand column before proceeding further.

All comments (both pro and con) are welcome and can be signed or anonymous.

Saturday, February 22, 2014

BAY COLONY CLUB CONDO - RENTAL RESTRICTIONS?



Much hoopla, effort  and expense (our money) went into a recent effort to change BCC's documentation.  Changes were sought to lower approval of future documentation changes to 60% rather than the existing 75% of owners and also to restrict rentals.  All rational BCC owners predicted that the votes were unobtainable and the vote was a waste of time and money.  
Then, shock and horror, it was alleged that rigging the vote was suggested  This worked very nicely with our recent Board election, but the pre-vote publication of possible rigging put the kibosh (temporarily) on Document changes.
 As far as rental restrictions are concerned, Becker & Poliakoff, the most prestigious condo law firm in Florida, recently published an article on the subject in their blog.  http://www.floridacondohoalawblog.com/  BCC owners should find it of interest.  The following is quoted verbatim (excepting stress and highlighting by your blogger):
"Rental Caps In Condominiums Are Hard To Enforce
By Joseph Adams on February 2Oth, 2014
Question: Over half the units in our condominium, which was an apartment complex prior to conversion several years ago, are tenant occupied. Those who own property typically treat it with more respect than those who are renting. We have found that tenants overtax our recreational facilities, do not control their pets and generally disrespect the peace and quiet of our community. The majority of our violations are related to tenant-occupied units. Is there any law prohibiting such high rental rates in a condominium setting? If not, can our condominium documents be amended to place a cap on rentals? J.M. (via e-mail)
Answer: With the glut of foreclosures and bank-owned properties being placed on the market at rock bottom prices over the past several years, it is not uncommon to see investors taking advantage of bargain prices. Some investors hold on to the property in the hopes that the real estate market will continue to improve as it has been over the past couple of years. In the interim, they often rent out the property to generate a return on their investment and help with carrying costs. There are other investors that buy for the sole purpose of holding on to the units and generating rental income.
I am aware of no law that limits the number of permissible rentals. It is however, often hard to find conventional mortgage financing in condominiums with high rental percentages. The declaration of condominium can be amended to impose a cap on rentals. As noted in previous columns, I am not a big fan of rental caps because they are difficult to enforce. One reason is this, the Florida Condominium Act specifically provides that amendments prohibiting unit owners from renting their units, altering the duration of the rental term, or specifying or limiting the number of times unit owners are entitled to rent their units during a specified period applies only to unit owners who consent to the amendment and unit owners who acquire title to their units after the effective date of that amendment. A rental cap would have the effect of prohibiting some owners from renting their units if the limit has been reached. Accordingly, unless the amendment is approved unanimously, it will only apply to those who vote in favor of the amendment or take title after the amendment is recorded in the public records."

8 comments:

Living on Social Security said...

In 2009 there were 32 liens on properties here in Bay Colony. Good thing investors stepped in and bought them, otherwise, we would be having to get a loan to pay the increase in maintenance.

Anonymous said...

That is all BCC does and thrives to do is put liens on people's properties. Look in the Broward County public records. There are thousands of entries showing liens against BCC property owners.

Anonymous said...

New twist on rentals if they are denied. The owner sells 1% to renter and they become owners!!!!!!!!Boards who are tyrants, force landlords to resort to these options.
Live and let Live.

Anonymous said...

Why is it that one purchases a home in an association knowing and agreeing that there are rules, regulations and a goal for the common good but wants to stand alone when mortgages and maintenance go unpaid? Those same people start to complain when the condo association, in self preservation mode, puts liens on said properties. I'm just asking, but what do you think is the solution if you don't like liens? I'm sure I'd hear you complain quite loudly if the condo association had to raise maint. fees in order to cover its bills. Why buy in an association if when the going gets tough, you want to be an island and say, that's their problem, not mine. An association by definition is a collaborative group of people yet now Anonymous from March 1, is complaining about necessary liens for the assoc. to protect itself? I'm scratching my head.

Anonymous said...

Let me inform those participating in this blog discussing liens, I know for a fact about liens that have been placed on properties illegally. Not for non-payment of a mortgage or for non-payment of maintenance and this has been done by crooks with seats on boards in efforts to steal people's property right from under them. I have seen it done. Luckily when the owner got to court the criminals seated on the board were exposed. I have seen frivolous liens placed on properties right here in Bay Colony ALSO and for a fact I can tell you it was not for NON-PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE OR MORTGAGE.

Anonymous said...

So where is the promised article on how the Election was rigged? We've been waiting almost a month now.
I know you've moved out of BCC, but if your going to keep the Blog going, please follow through on what you promised.
Otherwise, just FUGGEDABOWDIT.

Anonymous said...

March 7 Anon,
If it was not for mortgage or non-maintenance (which is the only legal reason for a lien), please tell us what it was for:
1. Vendettas maybe???????
2. Make their enemies spend $$$$.
I have no idea, please help us understand how the crooks do it and why. thank you

Anonymous said...

Years ago, the maintenance was received and paid in the office. Need I say more? It is not like that now because the maintenance is paid and received by BB&T not a flake secretary in the BCC administrative office. Do you get it now?